Americans indulged in the luxury of spa services, contributing nearly $17 billion to the industry in 2012. Facials, promising radiant, youthful skin, claimed a significant share of this expenditure. But are these treatments worth the hype and hefty costs? Let’s dive into the science and separate fact from fiction.
Ushma Neill, editor-at-large of the Journal of Clinical Investigation, had a revelation during a spa visit in Santa Fe. The esthetician claimed that a citrus emollient would cleanse her liver. Prompted by skepticism, Neill delved into the scientific validity of spa facials, publishing her findings in a 2012 report. Her conclusion was straightforward: “I realized just how useless it all was,” she asserts, sharing that she hasn’t had a facial since.
While facials can temporarily enhance the skin by providing intense moisture and addressing blemishes, the effectiveness varies. Dr. Joel Cohen, an associate clinical professor of dermatology, dismisses the allure of fancier, pricier services claiming to combat aging or inflammation. According to Cohen, many of these treatments, such as ozone and stem-cell extracts, are “complete malarkey.”
Experts agree that beyond moisturizing, most topical creams offer limited lasting benefits, especially when applied sporadically in a spa setting. Chemical peels may stimulate skin cell turnover, but for sustained results, daily skincare is key. Regular cleansing, moisturizing, and sunscreen application form the foundation for healthier skin.
In the quest for true skin health, it’s essential to navigate the allure of extravagant spa treatments and prioritize evidence-based skincare practices. Rather than succumbing to myths, embrace a holistic approach grounded in science for a radiant and lasting glow.
Add a Comment